The Stout Republican

Democrats win Douche of the Week!? More like the next 4-8 years… Here’s to them

Democrats, Douche of the Week, Your Government

This is how I deal with growing insomnia.

Hypocritical Much?

Douche of the Week

…

that’s right

…

Douche of the Week

Pyrrhic defeatists that they are, 55% of WHITE Evangelical Republicans say they will consider voting for a 3rd party candidate if the Reps and Dems choose Rudy and Hillary, respectively, as their presidential candidates. Dam abortion and gay marriage!!!

All because they want to have their religious beliefs as law. Sound Sharia-like enough for you? Many of you know the fact that the West’s system of laws and a largish share of the culture are based on and guided by Judeo-Christian beliefs. Laws and culture BASED on the J/C system of belief, not word for word and not guided on a blind path as some would or would not believe.

This is exactly why from time to time that I am tempted to vote democrat. The Evangelical Right is as moon batty as the farthest left moon bat. Only the far lefties are mostly smart enough to vote democrat (unless totally full goose bozo looney) and not to vote for the socialist candidate or Nader (remember how he was slapped down by the dems last time).

I am big on choice for abortion aka reproducive rights and when we finally get our heads on straight TBKA genetic material rights (oh for the want of an artifical womb, then we’ll really have some fun). I am also big on gay rights. Marriage? Call it what you want it will be the same thing either way. Dumb ass gays want to join the divorce lawyers support group come on down!

It is up to me to influence and defend my family and the people around me so they can make their choices as they believe…NOT religerment.

I SHALL NOT SUBMIT,

GoingThere

Bad Republican, Douche of the Week, Judeo Christian, Nanny State, Religion

gendre on

Harry Potter fans, the rumors are true; Harry Potter, student wizard, broom riding quidditch player, member of the house of Gryffindor and our hero is heterosexual. J.K. Rowling, author of the mega-selling fantasy series that ended last summer, outed the beloved character Friday night while appearing before a full house at Carnegie Hall.

gendre off

Obviously a play on the outing of Dumbledore as being gay. And his sexual preference is important because? Why was it necessary to provide this level of “insight”? “Insight” that has absolutely nothing to do with any of the characters as developed in the front story. A reach into the back story? The tools and components of story telling/writing, loyalty, betrayal, good vs evil seem to provide us with all the insight we need. The coloring of the tools and components by the writer wreaks of “grandeur”.

I could care less if someone is or is not gay. Dumbledore’s outing provides no additional insight into the story or it’s characters, though it certainly provides insight into the “character” of the author.

IMHO her declaration of a character’s sexual preference serves no other end then to further her own fading front story, a grasp at continuing relevance.

901 seconds and counting…J.K who?

GoingThere

UPDATE: TIME Magazine..Put Dumbledore Back in the Closet

HAHAHAHA one can’t make this stuff up, TIME magazine even chose a photo for the article that is a prissy shot (read as sterotype gay like pose, TIME STEROTYPING YEP!) of Dumbledore. Dumbledore a role model? A gay role model? Life IS stranger than fiction.
gt

Douche of the Week, Limousine Liberal

It’s been a while since I’ve bestowed my “Douche of the Week” honor upon anyone…it’s time I do so, with Zazz.

My roommate is a huge fan of the artist Derek Hess (myspace page here, clothing line here). He’s bought several of his prints online, and they adorn our living room…framed.

His art is incredible…very stylized gesture drawing.

On one of his recent blogs, he posting this in a fit of artistic wisdom.

north pole oil

have you all been following this? it’s incredible, as you know the north pole ice is melting and the polar bears will be extinct within’ our lifetime. the ice is melting as a direct result of global warming. global warming is a direct result of the burning of fossil fuel. underneath the sea floor of the north pole is a vast reserve of oil. 5 countries are claiming it because as the ice melts, the oil will be accessible. so…..do to the destruction of are planet from the burning of oil, there’s now a rush to drill up more to burn. am i the only one that sees the madness in this?

here’s a recent article, although there’s more up to date stuff happening every day

Observer Link

I always love articles that the set up is “as you know…” especially when it frames the argument around something that is factually wrong.

To continue with the story. My roommate, who is as I said a huge fan (and I should mention non-political), saw this blog post…and as any intelligent thinking man would do, questioned the polar bear premise. We watch a lot of discovery channel over here. So he found an article by the National Center For Policy Analysis, and responded to Derek Hess by posting this article in his comment section, I’ll just quote the good parts.

The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) while arguing that polar bears are at risk from global warming presented data which actually undermine their fear.

According to the WWF there are approximately 22,000 polar bears in about 20 distinct populations worldwide. Only two bear populations – accounting for about 16.4 percent of the total number of bears – are decreasing, and they are in areas where air temperatures have actually fallen, such as the Baffin Bay region. By contrast, another two populations – about 13.6 percent of the total number – are growing, and they live in areas were air temperatures have risen, near the Bering Strait and the Chukchi Sea. As for the rest, ten populations – comprising about 45.4 percent of the total number of bears – are stable, and the status of the remaining six populations is unknown.

For now the government will be taking public comments on the proposal – let’s hope some science: facts, accuracy and truthfulness make an appearance before this goes too far. The polar bear is not threatened or endangered and should not be listed as such as a backdoor way to restrict energy use in the United States.

So this was posted in response to Derek Hess’ assertion that “as you know” polar bears are dying. Hess’ MySpace account requires that he approve a blog response before it is listed (unlike this site). His response? The comment was not only not approved, but my roommate was kicked off of Hess’ friend list, which is the myspace equivalent of being banned from a blog. This is of course for posting a dissenting view point. I’m assuming that as an artist he would be open to other peoples ideas and or beliefs, but as with many artists, the flow of information is one way, unchecked by fact or dissent…usually rolling around in a mudhole of self congratulation and ego.

Now, the meat of the problem isn’t that Derek Hess is wrong. For all I know, he might be able to provide the real empirical evidence to support his claim, which might have been an appropriate response ([sarcasm] at which point I would delete that evidence, and ban him from my website [/sarcasm]). My contention is only that he is an asshole. When faced with an opposing view, he not only disregards it, but takes effort to cut that person off from what might have been a debate, but was in fact only a dissortation. I’m sure his cocktail parties are just a plethora of assorted ideas, interesting chats, lively debate, and not one minded lock steppers. Now I support anyone’s decision to be a douchebag, and as douchebaggy as ignoring views that don’t conform to ones religious blind faith in the declining environment is…I also support my ability, with my government given freedom of speech rights, to say that Derek Hess, while talented as an artist, is not very talented at being a nice guy. I might go so far as to say that he might be the human version of a penis…while able to create beautiful things when applied properly, most of the time it just runs around indiscriminately Fucking people who might just want to be friends.

Art, Douche of the Week, Environment

A couple of years ago I picked up an interesting book with a terrible cover, The Truth About Hillary by Edward Klein.  I was fascinated when reading about her background, education, and her ultimate strategy to get into the White House.  Do keep in mind that this book was written before Hillary communicated any desire to be President.  In fact, when this book came out, she was adamantly denying such an aspiration.  Well, we all know how that seems to have panned out.  I have to say, though her true intentions are transparent, her strategies seem to be flawless.

Now, it could be the fact that my kid brother has decided to join the Special Operations division of the Marine Corps.  Or perhaps it is the fact that my due date is quickly approaching and I’m seriously considering our nation’s future.  Most likely it is the fact that her face is all over every news station and newspaper that comes into view lately.  Whatever the reason, I can’t help but be interested in Hillary’s stance on war / international policies, etc., which leads me to an article today on the Washington Post.  Apparently, she has yet again has been caught doing the flippity floppity.  ”Nukes?  Never!  Wait, Obama says what?  Nevermind.  Nukes?  Never say never.”  (Sounds familiar: “War?  It looks like the American public wants it, so LET’S ROLL!  Wait?  Now the public doesn’t like it?  I didn’t mean to vote for war.  I was misled.  Evil, evil Republicans…it’s all their fault!”)

As I believe it is essential to understand and really research those running in our Republican party to know what we are voting for, I believe it is equally important to know who and what we are up against.  With someone like Shrillary flippity flopping, the only common denominator in her policies has been a communist / socialist / steal-from-the-rich-to-make-me-look-better approach.  Lord help us if she calls

home once again.

Communism, Democrats, Douche of the Week

Apparently, it takes a village to raise an American, at least in Shrillary Clinton’s world.  She has a grand philosophical idea that personal responsibility and free market are BAD, and a utopia society where everyone is on the same playing field financially and economically will solve all the problems our country is currently in the midst of. 

Hey, at least she’s showing her true colors.  A socialist, communist society is what she is after, people.  Watch how her gameplan unfolds.

Communism, Democrats, Douche of the Week, Nanny State

Racism alive and well in people of all colors or ethnicity…

What a racist question!!! What racist answers!!!

What does color or ethnicity have to do with athletic ability?

Didn’t we learn anything from Howard Cosell? Jimmy the Greek?

Shame on you PETER PRENGAMAN, Associated Press Writer! SHAME ON YOU!!!

GoingThere

Douche of the Week, msm

Kinky Kerry’s Masters and Mistresses at the RNC risked exposing his sub-status today in order to steal the 2006 elections from the democrats.

Having trained KK, as Kerry is unaffectionately demeaned by, to spontaneously self destruct while serving in V-et-NAM he was unleashed as a RNC mole upon his adoringly democratic public. Having performed barely within his training during the 2004 election he was rewarded with having to continue his work as an RNC mole until 2008, a spanking count to 100 (per cheek) and a water boarding (15 seconds, KK is such a panty wussie).

“KK’s latest spontaneous self destructive mission was unplanned but totally effective. It is a shame that he will no longer be as effective for our use in 2008.” said Karl Rove, KK’s longtime Master.

drum-roll cymbal crash!!!

It’s a joke geeze lighten up, I was just trying to use Mr. Kerry as an illustration of how to turn potential success into certain failure. Okay, so I can’t tell a joke…

GoingThere

Democrats, Douche of the Week, John Kerry