Home > Communism, Democrats, Douche of the Week > The Truth About Shrillary

The Truth About Shrillary

August 10th, 2007

A couple of years ago I picked up an interesting book with a terrible cover, The Truth About Hillary by Edward Klein.  I was fascinated when reading about her background, education, and her ultimate strategy to get into the White House.  Do keep in mind that this book was written before Hillary communicated any desire to be President.  In fact, when this book came out, she was adamantly denying such an aspiration.  Well, we all know how that seems to have panned out.  I have to say, though her true intentions are transparent, her strategies seem to be flawless.

 

Now, it could be the fact that my kid brother has decided to join the Special Operations division of the Marine Corps.  Or perhaps it is the fact that my due date is quickly approaching and I’m seriously considering our nation’s future.  Most likely it is the fact that her face is all over every news station and newspaper that comes into view lately.  Whatever the reason, I can’t help but be interested in Hillary’s stance on war / international policies, etc., which leads me to an article today on the Washington Post.  Apparently, she has yet again has been caught doing the flippity floppity.  ”Nukes?  Never!  Wait, Obama says what?  Nevermind.  Nukes?  Never say never.”  (Sounds familiar: “War?  It looks like the American public wants it, so LET’S ROLL!  Wait?  Now the public doesn’t like it?  I didn’t mean to vote for war.  I was misled.  Evil, evil Republicans…it’s all their fault!”)

 

As I believe it is essential to understand and really research those running in our Republican party to know what we are voting for, I believe it is equally important to know who and what we are up against.  With someone like Shrillary flippity flopping, the only common denominator in her policies has been a communist / socialist / steal-from-the-rich-to-make-me-look-better approach.  Lord help us if she calls

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

home once again.

Communism, Democrats, Douche of the Week

  1. Erin Platt
    August 10th, 2007 at 09:38 | #1

    I went to the union debate in Chicago on Tuesday and I could not believe how they were cheering her on. Her husband signed NAFTA. If she wants to use him as a pair of crutches, then she better be prepared from the backlash for us all to remind her that HE is the reason she needs those crutches, HE’S the reason one of her legs are broken – she broke the other one herself. Sam Walton of Wal-Mart said he would shut down before letting his workers unionize, and he had a good lawyer to ensure it didn’t happen – HILLARY CLINTON.

    Last night, she was at the gay debate, more cheers. WHAT? Her husband passed more laws under his administration detrimental to homosexuals than President Bush has. In fact, they debated about it a lot and proposed legislation, but the Republican Congress didn’t pass any! Here she is – SHE DID – and the Republicans that will not debate with them LOSE their vote – AND SHE WINS IT ON A PACK OF BS???? Unreal!

    She just tells lie after lie after lie – and they love her and blindly believe her without looking at the facts. She said at that debate Tuesday, “I have been fighting the right-wing machine for fifteen years.” YEAH – AND THEY KICKED YOUR ASS ALL OVER THE PLACE TOO! Besides, why would she say anything like that in the first place? Comments like that are not what a good president would say. News flash you stupid BROAD (I AM being PC – she is a BROAD) : if you are president, THEY will be your constituents too. We need a leader that will unite us, not one that promises further divide.

    She had all these signs with people passing out fliers outside the debate saying “Time for a change.” They tried to hand me that garbage and I said, “No thanks, that slogan is an oxymoron isn’t it? Plus, I am Democrat.”

    God help us, the end of the world is coming if she wins that nomination. At times like this, I wish I believed in reincarnation. We sure could use an Abe Lincoln or a FDR on the bi-partisan peanut gallery of presidential candidates right now.

  2. August 10th, 2007 at 10:40 | #2

    A part of me hopes Hillary wins, the anarchist part. It will seal the fate of one side of the demoblican/republicrat bipartite and with the accompanying collateral damage to the other side we might just see some real change. Yes it will be painful but I all too often see no other way to make any real changes.

    RG…funny how things change when it get’s personal, even for someone that has the common sense that you have shown here. It needs to get really personal for all of us before most will see the truth.

    Burn it all down,

    goingthere

  3. August 10th, 2007 at 11:25 | #3

    Check out http://gawfer2001.blogspot.com He’s got a great breakdown of one more Hillary crime.

  4. Practical Radical
    August 10th, 2007 at 17:35 | #4

    Republicans and Hillary-Hating Democrats have nothing to fear in regards to her. She has no chance to win the election. Howard Dean led in all the polls going into the primaries and suffered his much-deserved melt down. Let’s hope history repeats itself.

    (Sorry, I don’t know how to change the size of this thing)

    Sorry to change the subject, but I was wondering if anyone finds it interesting that the new French President hasn’t visited Bush, or that Bush hasn’t welcomed him here. Or, have they met and I just didn’t know?

    Anyways, if they haven’t met…I’m just curious as to why that’d be and if it’s rare for a head of state not to visit the head of state of the country they’re vacationing in.

  5. August 11th, 2007 at 17:57 | #5

    I edited the size of the video in the above comment for disclosure.

  6. Practical Radical
    August 12th, 2007 at 18:18 | #6

    Looks like I simply wasn’t patient enough. Sarkozy, or whatever his name is, and Bush have now met. And, they actually seemed extremely happy together.

    What that’s about, maybe only Ted Haggert would know…

  1. No trackbacks yet.
You must be logged in to post a comment.