The Most Awesomeness Math Ever
H/T to Allah at Hotair (my usual haunt):
Scientists believe they have worked out a formula to calculate how “beer goggles” affect a drinker’s vision.
The drink-fuelled phenomenon is said to transform supposedly “ugly” people into beauties – until the morning after.Researchers at Manchester University say while beauty is in the eye of the beer-holder, the amount of alcohol consumed is not the only factor.
I think there are other considerations that may be made, for instance…based on the “Beer Goggle effect”, how does this influence ones decision from selecting from an array. In addition, external influences such as friends. Is there a variable that can be considered in regards to “wingman” looking out for you? The better the friend, the more influential the effect of Beer Goggles as a percentage of 1…throw some parenthesis around that sucka and multiply by a ratio of 1/x (the greater the x, the more one relies on or trusts a friend to guide him towards/away from danger)…however, that effect looses influence the more alcohol one consumes (that’s the “no way dude, she is too hot” effect)…maybe some regression analysis.
The possibilities are endless!
Stout, this post is positive proof that you are, in fact, a liberal in denial.
To scientifically justify the connection bonding humans can make, in the name of love, whether making it or taking it, by means of drug use (face it, alcohol is a drug)…proves that you are the most unChristian, free loving hippie of us all!
Hey, liberal or conservative, we all need a little love!! Nice post SR!!
OK PR. Timeout. Christ himself turned water into wine so alcohol consumption is NOT inherently “unchristian”. I can’t prove the formula nor the variables mentioned but have experienced firsthand the BG phenomenon and this in no way defines or proves any philosophical proclivities whatsoever.
Haha, I was TOTALLY joking! However I think it’s AWESOME that you reason how Christian-like alcoholism is by mentioning that Jesus turned water into wine. CLASSIC!!!
And, by the way: Happy 4-20!
DAMN rookies always over simplifying and solving for the trivial solution!!! This is where our system of education leads us? Bausch and Lomb sponsoring a hunt for the freakin TRIVIAL SOLUTION!?
What about normalizing for gender G, sexual preference Sp and ethnicity E? And as SiR points out the contribution of the wing person, Wp, (SiR your genderist slip is showing) DUH?!
Then there is that pesky little thing called time, T, that is known to temporally affect visual recognition of the aesthetically-challenged.
Integrate the original equation wrt to what? Distance? Units of alcohol consumed? Smokiness? ZZZZzzzzz
What about contributing to the units of alcohol consumption of the non-aesthetically challenged in hopes of inducing the beer goggle effect to enhance the aesthetically challenged potential success?
tsk tsk tsk The effin TRIVIAL SOLUTION bites again…0=0 elegant and pretty isn’t it… WRONG and no partial credit for the blokes in Manchester…
What would Mr. Rogers have said?!
GoingThere
As a man who married up, I have worked with this equation for years, with my own addition.
I have to take into account the half-life of the narcotics used as well as the increase in her tolerance in order to keep Smart-Lass thinking I am good looking.